Carl Baehr
City Streets

Lincoln Memorial Dr. Was Under Water

A 20-year landfill project created the road and the city’s waterfront playground.

By - May 20th, 2016 10:31 am

A 20-year landfill project created the road and the city’s waterfront playground. Back to the full article.

Photos - Page 2

Categories: City Streets, History

7 thoughts on “City Streets: Lincoln Memorial Dr. Was Under Water”

  1. Bill Marsh says:

    Great planning and urban development sucess story! A similar lakefront landfill project should be done to the area located from the Milwaukee River connecting south to South Shore Park. That portion of Milwaukee’s precious lakefront is not being used anywhere near its highest possible use. Chicago, Vancouver, Oakland, and even Jersey City understand the full potential and value of their waterfronts. If only we had a mayor with vision…

  2. Virginia Small says:

    We are indeed fortunate to have inherited this well-preserved lakefront. I believe Charles Whitnall was a driving force in that planning, as well as for other aspects of the parks system. Christian Wahl was a leader early on in forming the city’s first parks commission, recruiting Olmsted to design three of the first six newly created parks, etc. Wahl was also a bit of a designer.

    Carl, perhaps you could do future articles on these civic visionaries (if you have not already).

    The early Socialist leaders also played a big role in ensuring that Milwaukee had exceptional public amenities such as a great park system, and efficient sewers and such (and thus were called “Sewer Socialists”). They understood the role of the public realm in creating and maintaining quality of life.

    We desperately need real civic vision these days. Current elected officials are allowing parks legacies to decline with neglect, scheming to sell them off or otherwise privatize public amenities, and instead subsidizing private projects posing as “public infrastructure.”

  3. AG says:

    Bill Marsh, we can appreciate the idea of duplicating what was done north of the river by doing the same south. However, the port provides a surprisingly significant boost to the local economy. The port, the Jones Island treatment plant, the coast guard station, etc all have their uses and purposes. Could we fit more uses in some places? Yeah, probably. But you can’t replicate what you have on the north side along this stretch because of the other uses already in place. Not to mention the cost to do a project like that when you already have the amenity in place.

  4. Bill Marsh says:

    My contention is that the economic value of the port as-is is significantly lower than its potential value as a residential, commercial, and tech district. Especially if the lake frontage and harbor front was fully taken advantage of with private and public development.

    The Port of Milwaukee is ranked as the 91 for US ports by tonnage (we are below Escanaba!), and it is used primarily to ship low-value commodities. The number of port jobs in Milwaukee is miniscule relative what could be there. How could piles of salt, oil/gas tanks, and a bunch of old freighters docked over the winter be the best use of so much valuable water frontage? Obviously MMSD has to stay and same with the Coast Guard, but they can be worked around. I say leave a few piers for ship dockage on the north end of the lake front near MMSD, and redevelop the rest.

    Apparently as happens in metro Milwaukee, special interests and the lack of vision by our governmental leaders will result in kiling progress.

    PS-Rebuilding the I-794 freeway and Hoan Bridge is another case in point. Where else in this day and age do cities build (or rebuild) freeways on their waterfronts?

  5. Bill Kissinger says:

    2 comments: I believe the landfill used to form Veterans Park was spoil from the construction of the Interstate through Milwaukee, where massive amounts of fill were the result of creating the deep valleys for grade separation. I’m not sure where a similar source of fill would come from today.

    Second, the author references a plan to open up the lakefront by purchasing & razing the mansions along Prospect. There was a similar plan, partly implemented, to buy & raze mansions on the lake side of Lafayette & Terrace Avenues.
    Houses were to be removed north & south of the Villa Terrace, showcasing the house & grounds in splendid isolation.
    Several of these demos occurred during the 1960s and 70s when I was growing up on the East Side. The general decline of the area during the 50s made such a program possible, since the county could afford to buy these houses in the cheap.
    As the East Side was rediscovered in the 60s & 70s the county was priced out of the market & the plan ground to a halt.

  6. Tom D says:

    I believe the Veteran’s Park landfill came from material removed from MMSD’s Deep Tunnel project, not from freeway construction (which were largely complete a decade earlier).

  7. Virginia Small says:

    A history of Lake Park on the county parks website notes that Frederick Law Olmsted originally planned what eventually became Lincoln Memorial Drive, at least the northern section. That was around 1892. It does not say when the drive was first created.

    “The Olmsted plan for Lake Park envisioned a main road along the lakeshore below the bluff, another road that followed city streets along the top of the bluffs at the park’s western edge, and a connecting road from the base of the bluffs up through a ravine. Along the crest of the bluff he proposed meandering carriage roads crossing the ravines on the bridges.”

    http://county.milwaukee.gov/HistoryoftheParks16572.htm

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us