Steven Walters
The State of Politics

Green Bay Key In Supreme Court Race

Kloppenburg vs. Bradley echoes Prosser race, which was decided by Fox Valley voters.

By - Mar 7th, 2016 12:20 pm
Sign-up for the Urban Milwaukee daily email
JoAnne Kloppenburg vs Rebecca Bradley

JoAnne Kloppenburg vs Rebecca Bradley

The winner of the April 5 election for a 10-year term on the state Supreme Court may be the one who gets the most Green Bay-area votes.

The April 5 contest between Supreme Court Justice Rebecca Bradley and Court of Appeals Judge JoAnne Kloppenburg is a rerun of 2011. Then, it took a seven-week statewide recount to determine that Justice David Prosser had beaten Kloppenburg by 7,004 votes, out of 1.5 million cast.

The sound bites in this year’s race echo those of 2011: Bradley is Gov. Scott Walker’s handpicked justice, while Prosser was seen as allied with Walker and ultimately supported the governor’s signature law, Act 10. Walker appointed Bradley a Milwaukee County judge, a Court of Appeals judge and, finally, to the Supreme Court. Bradley is being helped by Republican Party officials. Kloppenburg is the perceived Democrat and revenge candidate, out to avenge 2011.

Statewide, the last Marquette University Law School poll had Kloppenburg and Bradley tied among respondents. But one out of every five likely voters said they knew too little about the candidates to pick one.

This year, one big difference is that the April 5 election will also include presidential primaries. But, after Super Tuesday victories nationally by Republican Donald Trump and Democrat Hillary Clinton, those two could be close to locking up their party nominations.

That could take the emotional drama out of Wisconsin’s presidential primary and therefore lower turnout on April 5. It also brings us back to the 2011 Supreme Court election as an indicator of what might happen in the Kloppenburg and Bradley contest.

One way the Marquette poll tracks opinions is by Wisconsin “media markets” – regions that have their own TV and radio stations and daily newspapers. A look at 2011 vote totals in the largest media markets shows how close the April 5 election could be:

*Milwaukee-area media market (Milwaukee, Waukesha, Jefferson, Racine, Washington, Ozaukee counties) vote totals in 2011: Kloppenburg, 212,432; Prosser, 284,853.

*Madison-area media market (Dane, Iowa, Columbia, Richland, Sauk counties) totals in 2011: Kloppenburg, 157,908; Prosser, 67,372.

But the Madison numbers change when you add 2011 votes in Rock County: 22,196 votes for Kloppenburg; Prosser, 14,636. Part of northern Rock County is considered in the Madison media market. When you add Rock County votes, the total numbers for Madison’s media market were: Kloppenburg, 180,104, and Prosser, 82,008.

More than half of all votes statewide were cast in just those two media markets in 2011. And Kloppenburg’s lead in those markets was 25,675.

But in the Green Bay/Appleton media market (Brown, Kewaunee, Manitowoc, Calumet, Winnebago, Outagamie, Waupaca, Door, Oconto, Shawano and Menominee counties), Prosser got a total of 125,170 votes and Kloppenburg, 97,288.

The significance: Prosser’s 27,882-vote margin in the Green Bay media market more than erased Kloppenburg’s lead in the two larger markets.

Remember, though, that Prosser started his political career in the Fox Valley. He was Outagamie County district attorney in 1977-78, and then represented the Fox Valley in the Assembly until 1996.

This year Green Bay-area voters won’t have one of their own in the April 5 election. Kloppenburg is from Madison, and Bradley from Milwaukee County.

The last Marquette poll of Green Bay media market respondents showed that most voters in that region haven’t decided how they will vote:  Bradley got a 21 percent favorable rating, 14 percent unfavorable, and 55 percent didn’t know about the race or had no preference. Kloppenburg got a 16 percent favorable rating, 22 percent unfavorable, and 61 percent didn’t know about the race or had no preference.

But UW-Milwaukee professor Mordecai Lee, a veteran political observer – and one-time political combatant, as a former Democratic legislator in the 1970s and ‘80s – said other factors will decide who wins the Supreme Court election..

“Yes, the Fox Valley is likely to be the best hunting ground for candidates in terms of persuading voters,” Lee said. “But, I’d guess, so also is southwest Wisconsin.” (Though, it should be noted, southwest Wisconsin has considerably less voters.)

And, Lee added: “There’s one important detail that automatically differentiates this year from 2011 – a major cycle for local elections such as Milwaukee mayor and Milwaukee County Executive. That automatically spurs turnout, compared to the relatively few offices on the ballot in 2011.”

Still, don’t be surprised if Kloppenburg and Bradley open campaign offices in Lambeau Field’s atrium.

Steven Walters is a senior producer for the nonprofit public affairs channel WisconsinEye. Contact him at stevenscwalters@gmail.com

7 thoughts on “The State of Politics: Green Bay Key In Supreme Court Race”

  1. Vincent Hanna says:

    In light of today’s news about Bradley I’d say this race is over.

  2. Steve says:

    I have to agree. But, we are dealing with the dastardly Republicans of this state, who have probably figured that this would come to light. I’m bettin’ they have already rigged the election, just like they rigged the last one between Kloppenburg and Prosser, another racist, bigoted pig.

  3. WashCoRepub says:

    It sounds to me like Steve has in his possessive solid evidence of vote tampering or rigging during the Kloppenburg/Prosser Supreme Court election. I would certainly encourage him to bring that evidence forward to a State elections official, or at the very least an investigative reporter. It’s a serious charge that merits a proper investigation, in my opinion, if evidence exists which it surely must, given the certainty of his allegation.

  4. Justin says:

    WashCoRepub: The 7000+ votes “found” by Kathy Nicholas in unsealed bags 24 hours after the election come to mind.

    Wonder how many votes the ReTHUGlican vote fraud machine will have to “find” this time in order to ensure the illegitimate victory of another Supreme Court justice in Walker’s Wisconsin?

    After the news yesterday about Bradley’s hateful positions, I’m thinking that the ReTHUGlican vote fraud machine will have to “find” at least 20,000 votes this time to ensure Bradley’s election.

    Walker’s Wisconsin: Most corrupt state in America.

  5. Tom Martinsen says:

    Excuse me, but wasn’t the Kloppenberg/Prosser race decided by some thousands of ballots discovered in Prosser’s favor in Brookfield – after the polls had closed?

    Tom

  6. Casey says:

    Both seem like activist judges…more so Kloppenberg. Might be best to go with a write in candidate.

  7. Vincent Hanna says:

    Is anyone not an activist judge these days?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *