Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism

Walker’s Book is Very Revealing

There are fascinating sections, including Walker giving staff a top ten list ridiculing public workers.

“Unintimidated: A Governor’s Story and a Nation’s Challenge.”

“Unintimidated: A Governor’s Story and a Nation’s Challenge.”

Gov. Scott Walker’s new book, “Unintimidated: A Governor’s Story and a Nation’s Challenge,” has been faulted for what it omits. Attention is also due to what it delivers: A vast portal into the mindset of Wisconsin’s most controversial politician.

The book, co-written by conservative scribe Marc Thiessen, provides ample ammunition to both Walker’s admirers and his detractors, often in the same passages. Such as when Walker, reflecting on his sweeping changes to collective bargaining, says “the union bosses … were the only ones who would get hurt in the entire process. Which was fine by me.”

Fans will applaud his righteousness. Foes will decry his dismissal of the sacrifices extracted from hundreds of thousands of public workers.

With a Nov. 19 release date, in time for Christmas and the next presidential election, “Unintimidated” is a work of unapologetic self-promotion. Walker lays claims to his status as a national leader and a politician of extraordinary courage — both undeniably true.

Yes, Walker fails to mention his unequivocal and likely unattainable campaign vow to add 250,000 private sector jobs. He neglects to say the John Doe probe of his Milwaukee County executive’s office led to six criminal convictions.

But Walker more than makes up for such omissions with his blunt candor in the rest of the book.

He dubs collective bargaining “the enemy of good government” and says he wanted to eliminate public employee unions entirely, but was constrained by his fellow Republicans. He accuses local government officials of succumbing to Stockholm syndrome, willing to betray taxpayers to appease “their captors,” the union bosses, who seek only to maintain the “protection racket” that pours cash into their coffers.

The protesters who flocked to the Capitol, elsewhere praised for general good behavior, are here portrayed as spewing obscenities, spitting on lawmakers and stinking up the joint.

At one point, Walker tells how he cheered his staff by sharing a conservative website’s top 10 list of signs “you might be a member of a public-sector union.” These included: “You get paid twice as much as a private-sector person doing the same job but make up the difference by doing half as much work.” “You know by having a copy of the Holy Koran on your desk your job is 100% safe.” And “You have a Democratic congressman’s lips permanently attached to your butt.”

And, after all this, the governor insists, “we always took the high road and never contributed to the hostility and the rancor.”

Walker notes that his campaign raised $37 million to fight the recall, but not that most of this came from out of state or that he and his supporters outspent their rivals nearly three to one, according to the nonpartisan Wisconsin Democracy Campaign.

In the Senate recalls, Walker says his side raised $12.5 million only to see “the unions” raise $25 million.

But WDC research director Mike Buelow says Senate recall candidates and all outside groups — not just unions — spent $23.4 million on Republicans and $27.2 million on Democrats.

Walker’s spokesman deferred comment to the book’s publisher, Sentinel. Its publicist, Jacquelynn Burke, says the Senate numbers are from “interviews with GOP campaign operatives” who estimated spending at the time, not “a comprehensive listing like the one generated by WDC” after the elections.

The book also says “Democrats and their union allies … spent more than $8 million” trying to oust Republican Sen. Alberta Darling. But WDC tallied just $4.4 million spent on behalf of Darling’s unsuccessful opponent, Sandy Pasch, compared to $5.5 million spent by Darling and her backers.

Burke says the $8 million figure was based on “an article that did not fully distinguish that it was total spending for both sides.” In other words, it’s not correct.

Walker’s book sets forth leadership precepts including “Own up to your mistakes.” In these particulars, and perhaps others, “Unintimidated” gives him fresh opportunities to lead.

Bill Lueders is the Money and Politics Project director at the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism (www.WisconsinWatch.org). The project, a partnership of the Center and MapLight, is supported by The Joyce Foundation.

The Center collaborates with Wisconsin Public Radio, Wisconsin Public Television, other news media and the UW-Madison School of Journalism and Mass Communication. All works created, published, posted or disseminated by the Center do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of UW-Madison or any of its affiliates.

6 thoughts on “Walker’s Book is Very Revealing”

  1. George Mitchell says:

    “The protesters…elsewhere praised for general good behavior….”

    The use of passive voice usually is a sign of journalistic weakness. As is the case in this example.

    Either Bill Leuders should have provided examples of who “praised [the Capitol protesters] for their good behavior” or Bruce should have deleted this passage.

  2. Gin Gerth says:

    Interesting article. I find it amazing that the Gov really doesn’t see the irony when he
    Talks about taking the high road. If this articles is any indication, the publisher
    Didn’t really care all that much about fact checking anything Walker puts forth
    As facts. This just re-enforces my desire not to buy the man.

  3. John Michlig says:

    George Mitchell (school choice advocate): Anyone who attended the protests in Madison would testify to “general good behavior.”

    In fact, having been there on two days of the protest, I would say “general good behavior” is an innocuous, lowball description.

    Mr. Mitchell: Get out your yellow highlighter and red pen and apply your “journalistic weakness” filter to this sham book. Better use you OfficeMax coupon, because it looks like to going is going to be rough for persons interested in facts rather than Walker’s “truth.”

  4. John Michlig says:

    …And excuse my iPhone-aided typos. A sign of mobile-communication weakness.

  5. chris byhre says:

    Hey John (Walker Recall signer) is this article about school choice? I am glad that you did not witness any of the violence and damage that some of the unhinged protesters unleashed upon the Capital. Sadly, it did still occur when a petulant group of thugs showed their true colors when a policy decision did not go their way. Not surprising that a lefty like Leuders pans it.

  6. jake says:

    I found the ignorant bigoted tea party folks bussed in by the Koch brothers 1 day of pro -walker cheer leadin going into the protestors trying to get in fights and confrontations with protestors by getting in the way of the flow.

    Walker supporters are tools, everyone of you.

Leave a Reply

You must be an Urban Milwaukee member to leave a comment. Membership, which includes a host of perks, including an ad-free website, tickets to marquee events like Summerfest, the Wisconsin State Fair and the Florentine Opera, a better photo browser and access to members-only, behind-the-scenes tours, starts at $9/month. Learn more.

Join now and cancel anytime.

If you are an existing member, sign-in to leave a comment.

Have questions? Need to report an error? Contact Us