Dave Schlabowske
Bike Czar

Bicycle Lobbyists Hit the State Capitol

More than 100 advocates met with legislators and pushed for pro-bicycle policies. Will it have an impact?

By , Bike Federation of Wisconsin - Apr 19th, 2013 10:00 am
Sign-up for the Urban Milwaukee daily email

Despite cold rain, over 100 people from more than 40 communities across Wisconsin came to the Bike Federation of Wisconsin’s Lobby Day in Madison on Tuesday April 9th. Armed with umbrellas, smiles, facts and personal stories, the army of advocates packed offices in our State Capitol to tell their elected representatives why bicycling is important where they live (and vote). This year the Bike Fed had two formal “Asks” for Lobby Day:

  • We ask that you set the biennial budget for the Transportation Alternatives program to $26,403,400.  Despite the sizable increase in Wisconsin’s transportation budget, the Governor’s draft budget proposes a nearly 50% reduction in investment towards Wisconsin’s transportation bicycle infrastructure. This funding level amounts to just 0.4% of the proposed $6.4 billion transportation budget. This small investment in bicycle transit would make a crucial difference to the dozens of Wisconsin communities who have prioritized bicycle travel, who are working to connect their bicycle networks and who are working to build healthier travel options for their residents, their visitors and their workforces.
  • Cosponsor / Support the Passage of Wisconsin’s Vulnerable User Law – LRB 1616/1. Motorists who injure or even kill vulnerable roadway users are often charged with minor offenses that impose minor penalties, if there is any penalty at all. In most cases, unless a motorist is intoxicated or flees the scene, civil or criminal penalties are rare. Wisconsin’s Vulnerable User Law, currently being circulated for cosponsors by Sen. Luther Olsen and Rep. Garey Bies, will help address this issue.

Among the advocates were several people who had personal tales of their spouses and friends who, despite riding their bicycles safely and legally, were killed in crashes in which the drivers were admittedly negligent, but got off with small fines and tickets for minor traffic violations. Laurie Landgraf  told the painful story of her well-known husband David Landgraf who was killed two years ago. Todd Jensen spoke for his wife, who survived the crash involving her and Jeff Littmann, because it was still too painful for her to speak about the death of her friend Jeff. James “Jimi” Sellers came to tell the story of his wife Nancy Sellers, who was killed by a drunk driver while out on an evening bike ride just two weeks after finishing Race Across America with Team Badger Bikers.

Sheboygan High School Junior, Maja Holcomb tells Chris Kegel (owner of Wheel & Sprocket Bike Stores, and Rep. Alvin Ott (R-Forest Junction) how Troy Tousey was killed despite the fact that he was riding single file, near the shoulder of the road on a group training ride with her.

Sheboygan High School Junior, Maja Holcomb tells Chris Kegel (owner of Wheel & Sprocket Bike Stores, and Rep. Alvin Ott (R-Forest Junction) how Troy Tousey was killed despite the fact that he was riding single file, near the shoulder of the road on a group training ride with her.

While most of the elected officials seemed sympathetic to the stories of tragic deaths of innocent people that sparked our efforts to pass a Vulnerable User Law, at least one legislator asked why he should support increased penalties to protect people on bicycles when so many of them fail to obey the current laws. Our advocates in that meeting were quick to respond with facts to debunk the myth that people on bikes break the laws any more frequently than people in cars. They also made a strong case for how the VU Law would protect all vulnerable road users, including people walking, in horse drawn carriages, law enforcement officers, etc. By the end of the meeting the legislator apologized and said he would likely support the VU Bill if it makes it to a floor vote.

More frequently, legislators questioned our first ask to save funding for bicycle projects in the budget because they said people riding bicycles don’t pay for roads. Our advocates were armed with facts to counter this argument against funding bicycle projects, but I am less sure that we have been able to clear up this common misperception. It feels like we have made progress with the members of the legislature, but less confident we have proved the value of bicycling to our Wisconsin economy with the administration.

Looking back after a good night’s sleep and a day to reflect, Lobby Day was a big success, but it is clear that even after 25 years of advocating for bicycling in Wisconsin, we all have much more work to do. We still need to change the perception that people on bikes are scofflaws, and we need to convince our elected representatives that money spent on bicycling has a tremendous return on investment for the state. Over the next week or so, I plan on exploring how everyone who rides a bike in Wisconsin can help debunk these myths and improve the perception of bicycling. Stay tuned…

Some of our founding Bike Fed members joined current staff after Lobby Day to celebrate 25 years of advocating for bicycling in Wisconsin.

Some of our founding Bike Fed members joined current staff after Lobby Day to celebrate 25 years of advocating for bicycling in Wisconsin.

This story was originally published by the Bicycle Federation of Wisconsin.

Categories: Bike Czar

3 thoughts on “Bike Czar: Bicycle Lobbyists Hit the State Capitol”

  1. COREY says:

    One thing to clear up – and, by the way, i am a bicyclist, but i also like to provide all facts. Total money spent on bicycling trails, lanes, etc, will be vastly greater in this budget than in previous budgets. Trans 75 ensures that.

  2. Jesse Hagen says:

    COREY, help a lay person such as myself verify your claim. For some reason, anonymous internet postings aren’t know for integrity.

  3. Corey says:

    Jesse – I have no specific numbers to back that up, nobody does… What I do have is the Wisconsin administrative code. Specifically Trans 75.04:

    https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/code/admin_code/trans/75

    Up to 20% of project costs is quite a bit of money… And if you look at the possible exceptions, good luck getting one. Personal experience shows that is not realistic…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>