<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Moderne Project Held for Special Committee Meeting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/10/27/the-moderne-project-held-for-special-committee-meeting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/10/27/the-moderne-project-held-for-special-committee-meeting/</link>
	<description>Championing Urban Life In The Cream City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:04:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Reid</title>
		<link>http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/10/27/the-moderne-project-held-for-special-committee-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-32105</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanmilwaukee.com/?p=3304#comment-32105</guid>
		<description>@Socialisme! Love the handle... Anyhow it appears to me they are looking at the risk vs reward of the project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Socialisme! Love the handle&#8230; Anyhow it appears to me they are looking at the risk vs reward of the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Socialisme!</title>
		<link>http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/10/27/the-moderne-project-held-for-special-committee-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-32096</link>
		<dc:creator>Socialisme!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanmilwaukee.com/?p=3304#comment-32096</guid>
		<description>If this goes through, they should rename it &quot;The Internationale.&quot; It&#039;s about as &quot;Moderne&quot;  as Russia in 1917. If the &quot;private&quot; developer is coming hat in hand to the City as keep of the public trough and the AFL/CIO (well maybe they came hat in hand to the developer) then this is about as absurd as our shares in GM. 

Park East: if you clear it they won&#039;t come, but maybe if you lend them money... 

If the City wants to roll the dice with other people&#039;s money, some jobs should be added to the pot, starting with the DCD commissioner&#039;s. The decision ought to be made on the basis of a rational risk assessment, not out of a desperate need to kickstart the Park East.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this goes through, they should rename it &#8220;The Internationale.&#8221; It&#8217;s about as &#8220;Moderne&#8221;  as Russia in 1917. If the &#8220;private&#8221; developer is coming hat in hand to the City as keep of the public trough and the AFL/CIO (well maybe they came hat in hand to the developer) then this is about as absurd as our shares in GM. </p>
<p>Park East: if you clear it they won&#8217;t come, but maybe if you lend them money&#8230; </p>
<p>If the City wants to roll the dice with other people&#8217;s money, some jobs should be added to the pot, starting with the DCD commissioner&#8217;s. The decision ought to be made on the basis of a rational risk assessment, not out of a desperate need to kickstart the Park East.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Reid</title>
		<link>http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/10/27/the-moderne-project-held-for-special-committee-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-32062</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanmilwaukee.com/?p=3304#comment-32062</guid>
		<description>@Spencer I&#039;d guess the income is generally at the upper ends, so not terribly mixed, but the building itself is very well designed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Spencer I&#8217;d guess the income is generally at the upper ends, so not terribly mixed, but the building itself is very well designed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer Agnew</title>
		<link>http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/10/27/the-moderne-project-held-for-special-committee-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-32059</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Agnew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanmilwaukee.com/?p=3304#comment-32059</guid>
		<description>Looks like a nice addition. Glad to see that the project is mixed-use, mixed-income, and dense---three important characteristics for quality urbanism! Its hard to tell from the rendering, but looks like the building will be well designed at the street-level too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a nice addition. Glad to see that the project is mixed-use, mixed-income, and dense&#8212;three important characteristics for quality urbanism! Its hard to tell from the rendering, but looks like the building will be well designed at the street-level too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Carson</title>
		<link>http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/10/27/the-moderne-project-held-for-special-committee-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-32054</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Carson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanmilwaukee.com/?p=3304#comment-32054</guid>
		<description>I am always a big proponent of more high rises in the downtown area, if only to make the city look as big as the population suggests. If this project will also revitalize the Park East area (which absolutely needs it) as well as brings more people downtown, there is no reason to deny it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am always a big proponent of more high rises in the downtown area, if only to make the city look as big as the population suggests. If this project will also revitalize the Park East area (which absolutely needs it) as well as brings more people downtown, there is no reason to deny it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
