<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Politics of Real Estate Development &#8211; Park East Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/04/22/the-politics-of-real-estate-development-park-east-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/04/22/the-politics-of-real-estate-development-park-east-edition/</link>
	<description>Championing Urban Life In The Cream City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:15:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JCG</title>
		<link>http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/04/22/the-politics-of-real-estate-development-park-east-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-23543</link>
		<dc:creator>JCG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 03:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanmilwaukee.com/?p=1685#comment-23543</guid>
		<description>PS - of course that look at the entire picture requires ignoring the blathering talk radio blowhards that cherry pick one tax and label us a tax hell.  Which also requires remembering we take on a bigger share of the pie because most large corporations here pay $0 in taxes because of loopholes (which is why we need things like the MORE ordinance, if only it weren&#039;t so weak and watered down).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS &#8211; of course that look at the entire picture requires ignoring the blathering talk radio blowhards that cherry pick one tax and label us a tax hell.  Which also requires remembering we take on a bigger share of the pie because most large corporations here pay $0 in taxes because of loopholes (which is why we need things like the MORE ordinance, if only it weren&#8217;t so weak and watered down).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JCG</title>
		<link>http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/04/22/the-politics-of-real-estate-development-park-east-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-23541</link>
		<dc:creator>JCG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 03:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanmilwaukee.com/?p=1685#comment-23541</guid>
		<description>Michael, that&#039;s because WI is a high property tax, low fee/consumption tax state.  The reverse is true for IL.  On the whole, when you look at the entire effective tax picture (including all property taxes, sales taxes, income taxes, fees, etc...) WI is right about average for the country (ranks 21st).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, that&#8217;s because WI is a high property tax, low fee/consumption tax state.  The reverse is true for IL.  On the whole, when you look at the entire effective tax picture (including all property taxes, sales taxes, income taxes, fees, etc&#8230;) WI is right about average for the country (ranks 21st).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MilwaukeeD</title>
		<link>http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/04/22/the-politics-of-real-estate-development-park-east-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-22713</link>
		<dc:creator>MilwaukeeD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 13:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanmilwaukee.com/?p=1685#comment-22713</guid>
		<description>Michael James, Chicago&#039;s sales tax is twice that of Milwaukee&#039;s, so it kinda evens out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael James, Chicago&#8217;s sales tax is twice that of Milwaukee&#8217;s, so it kinda evens out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael James</title>
		<link>http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/04/22/the-politics-of-real-estate-development-park-east-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-22684</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanmilwaukee.com/?p=1685#comment-22684</guid>
		<description>Chris, your comment is so great. 

Breaking up the lots seems like an amazing opportunity to create a new &quot;neighborhood&quot; in Milwaukee (as opposed to giant apartment structures or hotels that will be only slightly more interesting than the dirt, gravel, weeds, and broken down chain link fences currently existing in the Park East... Actually, I&#039;ve been living far from Milwaukee for the last year, but assume little has changed in the Park East).    

Also, Darrin, I like what you have to say. I want to move back to Milwaukee in October and probably buy a place in the city. I recently compared the taxes I will have to pay to the taxes on comparable  homes in other metro areas and was shocked... Can someone please explain why the taxes on a condo in Milwaukee are twice that of a similar unit in Chicago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, your comment is so great. </p>
<p>Breaking up the lots seems like an amazing opportunity to create a new &#8220;neighborhood&#8221; in Milwaukee (as opposed to giant apartment structures or hotels that will be only slightly more interesting than the dirt, gravel, weeds, and broken down chain link fences currently existing in the Park East&#8230; Actually, I&#8217;ve been living far from Milwaukee for the last year, but assume little has changed in the Park East).    </p>
<p>Also, Darrin, I like what you have to say. I want to move back to Milwaukee in October and probably buy a place in the city. I recently compared the taxes I will have to pay to the taxes on comparable  homes in other metro areas and was shocked&#8230; Can someone please explain why the taxes on a condo in Milwaukee are twice that of a similar unit in Chicago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeramey Jannene</title>
		<link>http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/04/22/the-politics-of-real-estate-development-park-east-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-21830</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeramey Jannene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanmilwaukee.com/?p=1685#comment-21830</guid>
		<description>@Darrin - Your taxes actually already did go to this, to tear down the freeway, and to build it in the first place.

You&#039;re incorrect that Milwaukee, the city, doesn&#039;t want smaller buildings.  The County wants the bigger buildings, to make the bigger one-time land sales.  The City would gladly settle for anything that complies with the compact guidelines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Darrin &#8211; Your taxes actually already did go to this, to tear down the freeway, and to build it in the first place.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re incorrect that Milwaukee, the city, doesn&#8217;t want smaller buildings.  The County wants the bigger buildings, to make the bigger one-time land sales.  The City would gladly settle for anything that complies with the compact guidelines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrin</title>
		<link>http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/04/22/the-politics-of-real-estate-development-park-east-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-21827</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanmilwaukee.com/?p=1685#comment-21827</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sick of mega developers with their snouts in the public trough. Not a penny of my tax dollars should go for this. Also, I agree that smaller lots sizes and smaller projects with more developers is a better approach. Of course Milwaukee will do everything they can to shoot down smaller projects and instead boost larger projects to increase their bottom line = the tax base. They could care less about the quality of life and character of neighborhoods. If Milwaukee wanted to encourage small developers they would lock in assessments for 10 years or more so you don&#039;t get penalized for improving your property and the neighborhood with double digit property tax increases. Milwaukee&#039;s backassward tax regime encourages slumlords and hazardous non-permitted improvements.

But I suspect Milwaukee will continue its track record of boosting assessments, for example jacking me $50,000 when I put on a new coat of paint. This city deserves everything that is coming to it: more slumlords, more non-permitted work , more crime, ballooning taxes due to bloated city payrolls and ultimately bankruptcy.  Honestly, chimpanzees could run this place better than the current management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sick of mega developers with their snouts in the public trough. Not a penny of my tax dollars should go for this. Also, I agree that smaller lots sizes and smaller projects with more developers is a better approach. Of course Milwaukee will do everything they can to shoot down smaller projects and instead boost larger projects to increase their bottom line = the tax base. They could care less about the quality of life and character of neighborhoods. If Milwaukee wanted to encourage small developers they would lock in assessments for 10 years or more so you don&#8217;t get penalized for improving your property and the neighborhood with double digit property tax increases. Milwaukee&#8217;s backassward tax regime encourages slumlords and hazardous non-permitted improvements.</p>
<p>But I suspect Milwaukee will continue its track record of boosting assessments, for example jacking me $50,000 when I put on a new coat of paint. This city deserves everything that is coming to it: more slumlords, more non-permitted work , more crime, ballooning taxes due to bloated city payrolls and ultimately bankruptcy.  Honestly, chimpanzees could run this place better than the current management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Reid</title>
		<link>http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/04/22/the-politics-of-real-estate-development-park-east-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-21557</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanmilwaukee.com/?p=1685#comment-21557</guid>
		<description>@Chris Yes.  You make a very very good point.  Not only will we get projects in the ground sooner with smaller lot sizes but we&#039;ll get a better city.  By having more developers with smaller projects you have a better chance of avoiding the &quot;Disneyland&quot; effect as well.  Great point!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris Yes.  You make a very very good point.  Not only will we get projects in the ground sooner with smaller lot sizes but we&#8217;ll get a better city.  By having more developers with smaller projects you have a better chance of avoiding the &#8220;Disneyland&#8221; effect as well.  Great point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/04/22/the-politics-of-real-estate-development-park-east-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-21555</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanmilwaukee.com/?p=1685#comment-21555</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no question these lot sizes need to shrink. Not only will it be very difficult to get projects off the ground (especially in this market) but it&#039;s also a better way to develop a city. That to me is bigger idea at play.

The great cities of the world didn&#039;t develop as mega-blocks devoid of scale or diversity. They developed incrementally over time. The streets we love in Milwaukee --- Brady Street, Milwaukee Street, Broadway in the Third Ward, etc., all had this piecemeal growth strategy.

What the Park East represents is an opportunity to think big about place-making by developing a plan that understands how to shape great public space. The buildings that define that space needn&#039;t be mega-block monsters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no question these lot sizes need to shrink. Not only will it be very difficult to get projects off the ground (especially in this market) but it&#8217;s also a better way to develop a city. That to me is bigger idea at play.</p>
<p>The great cities of the world didn&#8217;t develop as mega-blocks devoid of scale or diversity. They developed incrementally over time. The streets we love in Milwaukee &#8212; Brady Street, Milwaukee Street, Broadway in the Third Ward, etc., all had this piecemeal growth strategy.</p>
<p>What the Park East represents is an opportunity to think big about place-making by developing a plan that understands how to shape great public space. The buildings that define that space needn&#8217;t be mega-block monsters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Aster</title>
		<link>http://urbanmilwaukee.com/2009/04/22/the-politics-of-real-estate-development-park-east-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-21479</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Aster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanmilwaukee.com/?p=1685#comment-21479</guid>
		<description>Crazy how complex this stuff is.   My (tangential) two cents:  &quot;Eco Square&quot; is a terrible name.  It&#039;s great if they&#039;re going for green credentials, but god, please name it something without &quot;Eco&quot; or &quot;green&quot; in the name, they&#039;re killing it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crazy how complex this stuff is.   My (tangential) two cents:  &#8220;Eco Square&#8221; is a terrible name.  It&#8217;s great if they&#8217;re going for green credentials, but god, please name it something without &#8220;Eco&#8221; or &#8220;green&#8221; in the name, they&#8217;re killing it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

